Not All Fiber is Equal

Sometimes, we need reminders. This post from 2022 reminds us how different fibers in our diet and supplements affect us differently. Get to know your fibers and let food be thy medicine with this reminder….

Both conventional and functional medicine can agree that most people in our nation need more fiber. The average American diet includes more processed ingredients and less old-fashioned fiber, leaving many missing out on fiber’s benefits. We can all agree that most patients could profit from fiber and that they want the lower cholesterol, better gut health with less constipation, improved metabolic health, and lower cancer rates. Despite this consensus, in caring for patients with a wide variety of conditions and needs, we can sense that different people respond differently to different fiber types. In other words, not all fibers are equal. Different fibers can have different effects. Prodded by these suspicions, researchers studied the effects of two different fiber types and reported their findings in Cell Host & Microbe.

Prior research demonstrates the effects of high-fiber diets in various diseases. Fiber intake reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease. (1,2,3) It helps heal leaky gut by contributing to the production of short chain fatty acids. For many, fiber addresses the issue of constipation through increasing stool bulk and moisture content. Fiber intake keeps gut bacterial balance in check by feeding good bacteria. Fiber helps the production of B vitamins and vitamin K. It can even help pull out some toxins like mycotoxins during detox protocols.

Beyond just advising patients to eat more fiber, researchers want to know which fibers may be more beneficial in different situations. Clearly not all fibers are the same. Some contribute more to short chain fatty acid production. Some appear to have a greater cholesterol lowering effect. Some have more benefit for constipation and others less benefit. With that in mind the researchers in this study compared two specific fiber type: arabinoxylan (AX) from whole grains and long-chain inulin (LCI) found in Jerusalem artichokes, onions, and chicory root.

Several reasons for the differences lie within the various molecular structures of fiber types. Fiber molecules vary in what sugars are included, in their length, how much they branch, the patterns of their branching as well as the resulting solubility in water, their electrical charges and other properties. In foods, these various characteristics come mixed and make an understanding of specific effects of specific fibers more difficult. To overcome this difficulty, researchers used the purified forms of the AX and LCI instead of regular food sources.

AX has been reported in prior research to help with high blood pressure, lowering bad cholesterol (LDL), and lowering blood sugar. (4,5,6,7). LCI is known to increase the good bacteria Bifidobacterium (8,9,10) (Hidaka, Kokida, Slavin), lower constipation (11,12), improving glucose control and A1c in diabetes (13), and helping bone health (14). In the case of inulin, there also seems to be a dose dependent effect with higher doses appearing to harm the liver (15,16).

This study compared AX, LCI, and a combination fiber which included other fibers common in food products. Between groups they compared “stool metagenomics, plasma proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics, serum cytokines, and clinical values.” The average age of participants was 56.9 years and most began with mostly healthy clinical markers except for borderline high cholesterol levels.

In the study, there were a few general conclusions. First, there were some changes in objective and subjective findings which were common to both fiber types. Second, while there were some differences between fiber types, another pattern had emerged, one of individuals having consistently different results from other test subjects. Third, despite titrating up slowly from 10 to 20 to 30 grams over 1-week intervals, multiple people reported some side effects like bloating and flatulence. Beyond that the original article describes a number of other differences between AX and LCI which included differences in bacterial balance and reported clinical changes. At the highest level of LCI intake, there were some microbiome changes which might lead to adverse effects as well as a mild increase in the liver enzyme alanine aminotransferase (ALT). This liver test abnormality resolved when the LCI was stopped.

Without going into the detail of the article itself, one can take away the following: Soluble fibers like AX and LCI have benefits for our health in moderate doses that come in foods or supplementation; LCI can be harmful at higher doses; and medical research needs to further evaluate the variable effects of different fibers on different health conditions as well as factors that influence how a particular person will respond to a given fiber. Helping others live healthier, more abundant lives requires both research and practical applications.

 

Original Article:

Samuel M. Lancaster, Brittany Lee-McMullen, Charles Wilbur Abbott, Jeniffer V. Quijada, Daniel Hornburg, Heyjun Park, Dalia Perelman, Dylan J. Peterson, Michael Tang, Aaron Robinson, Sara Ahadi, Kévin Contrepois, Chia-Jui Hung, Melanie Ashland, Tracey McLaughlin, Anna Boonyanit, Aaron Horning, Justin L. Sonnenburg, Michael P. Snyder. Global, distinctive, and personal changes in molecular and microbial profiles by specific fibers in humans. Cell Host & Microbe, 2022; DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.03.036 . Accessed 5/11/22.

 

Thanks to Science Daily:

Cell Press. “Not all dietary fibers are equal.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 28 April 2022. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220428125440.htm>. Accessed 5/11/22.

 

Additional Citations:

1. Chutkan, G. Fahey, W.L. Wright, J. McRorie. Viscous versus nonviscous soluble fiber supplements: mechanisms and evidence for fiber-specific health benefits. J. Am. Acad. Nurse Pract., 24 (2012), pp. 476-487
2. Mozaffarian, S.K. Kumanyika, R.N. Lemaitre, J.L. Olson, G.L. Burke, D.S. Siscovick. Cereal, fruit, and vegetable fiber intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease in elderly individuals. JAMA, 289 (2003), pp. 1659-1666
3. B. Rimm, A. Ascherio, E. Giovannucci, D. Spiegelman, M.J. Stampfer, W.C. Willett. Vegetable, fruit, and cereal fiber intake and risk of coronary heart disease among men. JAMA, 275 (1996), pp. 447-451
4. X. Lu, K.Z. Walker, J.G. Muir, K. O’Dea. Arabinoxylan fibre improves metabolic control in people with Type II diabetes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 58 (2004), pp. 621-628
5. M. Neyrinck, S. Possemiers, C. Druart, T. Van de Wiele, F. De Backer, P.D. Cani, Y. Larondelle, N.M. Delzenne. Prebiotic effects of wheat arabinoxylan related to the increase in bifidobacteria, Roseburia and Bacteroides/Prevotella in diet-induced obese mice. PLoS One, 6 (2011), Article e20944
6. M. Ryan, R.P. Ross, G.F. Fitzgerald, N.M. Caplice, C. Stanton. Functional food addressing heart health: do we have to target the gut microbiota?. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care, 18 (2015), pp. 566-571
7. T. Tong, K. Zhong, L. Liu, J. Qiu, L. Guo, X. Zhou, L. Cao, S. Zhou. Effects of dietary wheat bran arabinoxylans on cholesterol metabolism of hypercholesterolemic hamsters. Carbohydr. Polym., 112 (2014), pp. 1-5
8. Hidaka, T. Eida, T. Takizawa, T. Tokunaga, Y. Tashiro. Effects of Fructooligosaccharides on intestinal flora and human health. Bifidobacteria Microflora, 5 (1986), pp. 37-50.
9. Kolida, K. Tuohy, G.R. Gibson. Prebiotic effects of inulin and oligofructose. Br. J. Nutr., 87 (2002), pp. S193-S197.
10. Slavin. Fiber and prebiotics: mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients, 5 (2013), pp. 1417-1435
11. Closa-Monasterolo, N. Ferré, G. Castillejo-DeVillasante, V. Luque, M. Gispert-Llaurado, M. Zaragoza-Jordana, S. Theis, J. Escribano. The use of inulin-type fructans improves stool consistency in constipated children. A randomised clinical trial: pilot study. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr., 68 (2017), pp. 587-594
12. Collado Yurrita, I. San Mauro Martin, M.J. Ciudad-Cabanas, M.E. Calle-Puron, M. Hernandez Cabria. Effectiveness of inulin intake on indicators of chronic constipation; a meta-analysis of controlled randomized clinical trials. Nutr. Hosp., 30 (2014), pp. 244-252.
13. Dehghan, B. Pourghassem Gargari, M. Asgharijafarabadi. Effects of high performance inulin supplementation on glycemic status and lipid profile in women with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Health Promot. Perspect., 3 (2013), pp. 55-63.
14. A. Abrams, I.J. Griffin, K.M. Hawthorne, L. Liang, S.K. Gunn, G. Darlington, K.J. Ellis. A combination of prebiotic short- and long-chain inulin-type fructans enhances calcium absorption and bone mineralization in young adolescents. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 82 (2005), pp. 471-476.
15. A. Coussement. Inulin and oligofructose: safe intakes and legal status. J. Nutr., 129 (Supplement) (1999), pp. 1412S-1417S.
16. Singh, B.S. Yeoh, B. Chassaing, X. Xiao, P. Saha, R. Aguilera Olvera, J.D. Lapek Jr., L. Zhang, W.B. Wang, S. Hao, et al. Dysregulated microbial fermentation of soluble fiber induces cholestatic liver. Cancer Cell, 175 (2018), pp. 679-694.

---

Sanctuary Functional Medicine, under the direction of Dr Eric Potter, IFMCP MD, provides functional medicine services to Nashville, Middle Tennessee and beyond. We frequently treat patients from Kentucky, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Ohio, Indiana, and more... offering the hope of healthier more abundant lives to those with chronic illness.